Development Agreement Clause Library: Fair Wording and the Governing Law

A development agreement (DA) is the master contract that fixes exactly what your Mumbai housing society and each individual member will receive in redevelopment, by when, and what happens if the builder fails to deliver. A fair DA is not a matter of trust — every promise must appear in enforceable words backed by a specific law, because a clause that is missing, vague, or one-sided is where societies quietly lose lakhs per member. This clause library takes the agreement apart clause by clause and, for each one, shows what a fair version should say and the precise provision that governs it.

This page is meant to be used, not just read. Below the checklist you will find model clause wording you can copy straight into your draft. The sanctioned figure is already filled in wherever the law fixes one. The only things left blank are the numbers your own society must decide — shown like this: Rs [_____]. Print the clauses, sit with the developer's draft beside them, and mark every clause that is missing or weaker.

Why the agreement must be read against the law, not the offer

The DA is usually signed after members have already chosen a developer and voted on the offer, in a mood of relief and trust. That is exactly when one-sided wording slips in. A generous offer letter means nothing if the binding, registered agreement waters it down — in Mumbai, if a promise is not written into the DA, you should assume it does not exist.

Several of these clauses are not optional. The redevelopment directive dated 4 July 2019, issued under Section 79A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, lays down binding conditions for co-operative housing society redevelopment — including a developer bank guarantee, a fixed completion timeline, and registered individual agreements. That 2019 directive superseded the earlier 3 January 2009 directive, so it is the current rulebook. Layered on top are the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA / MahaRERA), the Registration Act, 1908, and the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act (MOFA), 1963. Read this library alongside our guide to the red flags in a development agreement and the common agreement mistakes societies make.

The clause library at a glance

Use this table as a working checklist. Each clause should appear in your DA, worded to protect the society and every member — and each is anchored to a real legal source you can cite when you negotiate.

Model clause wording you can paste into the draft

What follows is drafting language, written to be copied. Where a sanctioned regulation or a section of an Act fixes a number, that number is already typed in. Where only your society can decide, the gap is marked [_____]. Nothing here replaces your own advocate — but it does mean you walk into the meeting with wording, not a wish.

Step 0 — find out which regulation your building falls under, because it changes what the law guarantees you

This one question decides whether your carpet area is fixed by regulation or is entirely up for negotiation. Most societies never ask it, and then argue about carpet with no floor under their feet.

Source: DCPR 2034 (sanctioned), Regulations 33(5), 33(7), 33(7)(B), 33(9) and 31(3). Greater Mumbai only — the rest of Maharashtra follows UDCPR.

Read that third row again. If you are an ordinary co-operative society, DCPR does not guarantee you a single square foot. The 15% / 10 sq m incentive belongs to the project, not to you, and it reaches your flat only if the agreement says so. That is why the wording below matters more to an ordinary society than to a cessed one.

Clause 1 — Area and entitlement

Clause 2 — Corpus

Clause 3 — Completion date and delay

Clause 4 — Defect liability

Clause 5 — Parking, with the number counted

Parking is the clause societies fight about after possession, when nothing can be done. DCPR fixes a minimum, and it is a different minimum depending on which regulation your scheme runs under.

Source: DCPR 2034 (sanctioned), Regulation 44, Table No. 21, Sr. No. 1 (Residential). Any fractional space of more than half is rounded up. For flats up to 60 sq m the owner or developer may, at its option, provide one parking space for each tenement. In gaothan, koliwada and adivasipada areas and on plots up to 9 m in width, parking may not be insisted upon. Two-wheeler parking of one space for every two residential tenements may be provided.

Clause 6 — Bank guarantee

Clause 7 — Transit rent

Clause 8 — No change to the plans

Clause 9 — The 70% project account

Clause 10 — Conveyance of title

Clause 11 — Conflict of interest and non-transferability

Clause 12 — Disputes

Area and entitlement — insist on RERA carpet area

The most common source of later disputes is a vague area clause. A fair version fixes each member's new flat size in RERA carpet area — the net usable floor area within the internal walls, as defined under RERA and MahaRERA — and states an exact square-footage figure for every member. Avoid drafts that mix "carpet", "built-up" and "saleable" area, because those terms let a builder shrink your actual flat while sounding generous.

The clause should confirm that any additional area over your existing flat, and any fungible compensatory area the plot allows under DCPR 2034, is delivered free of cost, free of any separate stamp-duty demand, and free of hidden charges. Because permissible area depends entirely on the plot — its road width, zone and applicable regulation such as Regulation 33(7) for cessed island-city buildings or Regulation 33(9) for cluster schemes — never accept a single "standard" FSI figure. Work out what your plot can actually yield with the site's FSI calculator and the additional-area calculator, then compare competing offers on the same carpet basis using the offer comparison tool.

Worked example: why the wording matters

Suppose your existing flat is 500 sq ft "built-up". One draft offers "550 sq ft built-up"; another offers "550 sq ft RERA carpet". After deducting walls and loading (often 20–30%), the first flat may give you only about 420–440 sq ft of usable space, while the second gives you the full 550 sq ft you can actually walk on. Same headline number, very different flat. Always convert every offer to carpet before you vote.

Corpus and transit rent — fix the amount and the timing

Corpus is the one-time compensation paid to each member for the hardship of redevelopment. A fair clause states a definite figure — per flat or per square foot — and ties payment to a clear event such as signing the Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreement (PAAA) or handing over the flat, in line with the safeguards expected under the Section 79A directive dated 4 July 2019. Beware wording that defers corpus to "on completion", which can be years away. Note also what DCPR does and does not do here: it prescribes a corpus minimum only for particular schemes — Rs 50,000 per tenement funding 10 years of maintenance in a cluster or urban renewal scheme under Regulation 33(9) clause 17, and Rs 40,000 under the SRA route in Regulation 33(10). For an ordinary co-operative society redevelopment there is no regulatory floor at all, so the printed figure in your agreement is the only protection that exists.

Transit rent (alternate accommodation) should be a fixed monthly amount, usually paid in advance for a block of months, with a defined yearly escalation so it keeps pace with the rental market. The clause should also cover one-time brokerage and shifting costs, and make clear that rent continues every month until the member receives legal possession of the new flat — not until a paper "completion" the member cannot occupy. Benchmark the rent for your area against real market data with the rent comparison tool before you accept a figure.

Bank guarantee and timeline — the enforcement backbone

These two clauses are what actually force a builder to finish. The Section 79A directive dated 4 July 2019 requires the developer to furnish a bank guarantee equal to 20% of the project value. A fair clause holds that guarantee in the society's name, keeps it valid until the Occupation Certificate is received, and lets the society encash it directly on default, without the builder's cooperation.

The same directive fixes the timeline: the project must be completed within 2 years of the plinth commencement certificate (CC), extendable to 3 years only in genuinely exceptional cases. A fair completion clause states this period, names an unambiguous start trigger (the plinth CC), and adds a delay penalty — such as double transit rent or a fixed monthly sum — if the builder overshoots. Independently, Section 18 of RERA entitles allottees to interest for the delay, or a refund with interest, when possession is late, which strengthens the society's hand even where the DA penalty is weak.

What a fair enforcement package looks like

Plan changes, defect liability and the project account (RERA)

Three RERA clauses protect members long after signing, and every DA should reflect them. First, Section 14(2) works in two limbs: under 14(2)(i) the promoter cannot alter the plans, specifications, fixtures, fittings or amenities of your flat without your previous consent, and under 14(2)(ii) it cannot alter the sanctioned plans, layout or specifications of the buildings or the common areas without the previous written consent of at least two-thirds of the allottees. Most drafts reproduce only the second limb, which is how a majority ends up redesigning an individual member's flat. Second, Section 14(3) makes the promoter liable to repair, at its own cost, any structural or workmanship defect reported within 5 years of possession — and to do it within 30 days of the notice, a deadline that sits in the same sub-section and is dropped from most agreements. Third, Section 4(2)(l)(D) requires 70% of the money collected from flat-buyers to be kept in a separate scheduled-bank account and withdrawn only in proportion to construction progress, with an annual chartered-accountant audit — the mechanism that stops a builder from diverting your project's funds elsewhere.

One structural point matters for societies weighing self-redevelopment against the builder route. A society that itself undertakes the construction and sells the surplus flats falls within the definition of "promoter" in Section 2(zk) of RERA, and must therefore register the project under Section 3 — unless the exemption in Section 3(2)(a) applies, that is, the area of land proposed to be developed does not exceed 500 sq m or the number of apartments proposed to be developed does not exceed eight. Check your project against those two thresholds before assuming registration is someone else's problem.

Protecting members individually — PAAA, non-transfer and conflict of interest

The society signs the DA, but each member also needs a separate, registered PAAA recording their specific flat number, carpet area, corpus and rent. Under Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908, documents that create rights in immovable property — the DA, the PAAA and the eventual conveyance — must be registered to be reliably enforceable, and the Section 79A directive expects both the DA and each PAAA to be registered. A fair clause makes PAAA registration mandatory for every member, with the developer bearing stamp duty (under the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958) and registration charges.

Two further safeguards protect against insider capture. Redevelopment rights must be non-transferable — the appointed developer cannot assign or sub-contract the project to an unknown third party without the society's written consent. And the Section 79A directive dated 4 July 2019 bars any managing committee member, office-bearer or their relative from being the developer, a partner, or financially interested in the project. A fair DA repeats this conflict-of-interest bar expressly. The same directive requires the developer-selection Special General Body Meeting to be video-recorded in the presence of the Registrar's authorised officer, and the shortlisted developer to have at least one MahaRERA-registered project — see our step-by-step 79A process guide for how these fit together.

Force majeure, termination, indemnity and disputes

Force majeure should be narrowly and specifically defined and time-bound. Genuine events — a natural calamity or a government construction ban — may pause the timeline, but the clause must not become a blanket excuse, and it must never suspend the builder's duty to keep paying transit rent to displaced members. The termination clause should give the society a real exit: the right to end the agreement on material breach, retake vacant possession of the site, and forfeit the bank guarantee. The indemnity clause should make the developer responsible for third-party, labour, statutory and neighbour claims arising during construction.

Disputes should be routed through Section 91 of the MCS Act, 1960 — the Co-operative Court — or a clearly worded arbitration clause fixing Mumbai jurisdiction, so members are never pushed into distant or one-sided forums. Where a developer's conduct crosses into fraud, remember that cheating (Section 318 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023) and criminal breach of trust (Section 316 of the BNS) are the current criminal provisions, having replaced the old Indian Penal Code sections; the two rest on different facts — breach of trust turns on property that was entrusted to the developer, cheating on a false representation that induced the society to part with it — so a police complaint must say which set of facts it alleges.

The finish line — conveyance and tax

A DA is not complete without a clause obliging the developer to convey ownership of the land and building to the society once the project is done. Under Section 11 of MOFA, 1963 the promoter must convey title to the society; if the builder stalls, Section 11(3) gives the society a powerful fallback — deemed conveyance, where the designated District Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies (the Competent Authority), after a hearing, issues a deemed-conveyance order and registers the conveyance unilaterally, without the builder's signature. Our conveyance guide explains the process in detail.

Two tax points also belong on your radar, though they are not DA clauses as such. Under Section 45(5A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for an individual or HUF the capital gains arising from a registered redevelopment agreement are taxed in the year the completion certificate is issued, based on the stamp-duty value of the member's new share plus any cash received. And under Section 194-IA, where the consideration or stamp-duty value of a property (other than agricultural land) is Rs 50 lakh or more, the buyer must deduct 1% TDS via Form 26QB. For any exact figure, consult a chartered accountant rather than relying on the developer's assurance.

What this means for your society

Before your next committee meeting, produce five things and put them in the minutes: (1) the regulation number your redevelopment will be processed under — 33(7), 33(7)(A), 33(7)(B), 33(5) or 33(9) — because it decides your carpet floor and your parking count; (2) your existing authorised BUA and tenement count, so the Regulation 33(7)(B) incentive of 15% or 10 sq m per tenement can be worked out; (3) the minimum parking number from Table 21 for your proposed flat sizes; (4) the corpus figure in rupees, with the note that DCPR sets no minimum for an ordinary society; and (5) the completion date, computed as plinth CC plus 24 months, to be filled in as a calendar date the day the plinth CC is issued.

Treat this library as a checklist, not legal advice. Read every draft clause against the model wording above and the law beside it, and flag any clause that is missing, vague, or loaded in the builder's favour. Because the numbers — carpet area, corpus, rent, the 20% guarantee, the 2-year timeline — decide the real value of your deal, run them through the site's calculators rather than trusting one builder's sheet, download the sample formats and checklists from the downloads library, and get a professional tender and agreement review before your general body votes.